Thursday 5 March 2015

What went good in our title sequence


As the time to finish our title sequence is approaching, it makes you think what went well in the process to make the title sequence. Of course,  there is still things to improve so it can be a more higher quality and standard.

One of the things that went well, is the variety of shots that were taken. Many different angle shots were taken (wide shot, location shots, close up shots and long distance shot etc...)  This is because by establishing different shots it allows the audience to feel different feelings about the footage also the shots allows the audience to know where the location is, so they know how the environment is. Such as if the camera is at a high angel it makes the character look less superior and significant.

This shot from the title sequence would be considered as a wide shot because it establishes
where the location/environment is to the audience.




The second thing that went well in the title sequence is the sound track that is featured in the title sequence.  The music is key and vital because it manipulates and controls how the audience is feeling towards the title sequence. Furthermore, when the footage gets more intense and fierce, the beat of the music changes to suit and match it more appropriately. Thus, it makes the final product more dramatic and intriguing to watch.
Art Condemned To Get Thousands Of Notes animated GIF


The last but not least thing that went well in the title sequence is the use of the titles in it. The title credits are on top of the moving images, so the audience would be more interested and more dramatic to watch. Furthermore, the title credits would be on the location shots, so the audience wouldn't miss any key ad vita information on the main plot of the title sequence.


Credits John Candy animated GIF














No comments:

Post a Comment